Green Eye Monitor Channel Expansion Support (GEM)

Ask questions about the GEM here.

Would you like to see more channels & 1 wire

I would like to see more than 32 channel support in the GEM.
13
24%
I would upgrade my GEM if it could support 48 additional channels.
13
24%
I would like to see more 1-wire channels supported.
14
25%
I would like to see the GEM support different 1 wire sensors.
15
27%
 
Total votes: 55
scyto
Posts: 258
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 7:24 pm

Re: Green Eye Monitor Channel Expansion Support (GEM)

Post by scyto » Thu May 22, 2014 8:21 pm

+1 for a channel expansion

I had to double up on a few receptacle breakers and my 2 sump pumps are on one channel.

I would also would like to add 2 more CT-A type channels so that I can monitor:
  • Supply as it goes into my geneac transfer switch from the electric company
  • Supply as it comes from the generator into the generac switch
(I am already monitoring the supply that comes from the generac auto transfer switch into my main panel)

This would allow me to understand if the transfer switch has any impact on supply (perhaps this pointless scenario but I have no clue!)
tnakelski
Posts: 74
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 1:27 pm

Re: Green Eye Monitor Channel Expansion Support (GEM)

Post by tnakelski » Fri May 23, 2014 9:28 am

scyto wrote:+1 for a channel expansion

I had to double up on a few receptacle breakers and my 2 sump pumps are on one channel.

I would also would like to add 2 more CT-A type channels so that I can monitor:
  • Supply as it goes into my geneac transfer switch from the electric company
  • Supply as it comes from the generator into the generac switch
(I am already monitoring the supply that comes from the generac auto transfer switch into my main panel)

This would allow me to understand if the transfer switch has any impact on supply (perhaps this pointless scenario but I have no clue!)
That is a pointless scenario
scyto
Posts: 258
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 7:24 pm

Re: Green Eye Monitor Channel Expansion Support (GEM)

Post by scyto » Fri May 23, 2014 3:02 pm

tnakelski wrote:
That is a pointless scenario
good to know :-), thanks.
Post Reply